Monday, 2 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Parliament Parliamentary Committee

India-Sri Lanka trade gap: exports hit USD 5.52 billion vs imports of USD 1.66 billion

The Standing Committee on External Affairs examined the state of India-Sri Lanka relations to identify gaps in trade, infrastructure, and security cooperation.

Who it concerns: Ministry of External Affairs; Indian and Sri Lankan citizens, businesses, and refugees.

What the committee found

  • Committee recommended that the India-Sri Lanka Joint Commission and Joint Working Group on Fisheries meet more regularly.
  • Committee recommended leveraging regional platforms like the Indian Ocean Rim Association for cooperation in maritime security, disaster management, and cybercrime.
  • Committee recommended addressing rules of origin and non-tariff barriers to increase Sri Lankan exports to India.
  • Committee recommended finalising the Economic and Technology Cooperation Agreement to extend the free trade agreement to services.
  • Committee recommended encouraging Indian investment in public-private partnerships for refineries, minerals, and airports in Sri Lanka.
  • Committee recommended resolving issues faced by Indian private companies in Sri Lanka and providing them diplomatic support.
  • Committee recommended jointly promoting the Buddhist Circuit in India and the Ramayana Trail in Sri Lanka.
  • Committee recommended expanding flight connections to Tier-II Indian cities and scaling up UPI merchant adoption.
  • Committee urged the Ministry to build consensus in Sri Lanka for the proposed 30 km land corridor/bridge linking India to Sri Lanka’s ports.
  • Committee recommended developing a viable business model for the stalled Trincomalee oil tank farms.
  • Committee called for time-bound completion of India’s grant projects, including the Indian Housing Project (10,000 houses).
  • Committee recommended that India play a bigger role in supplying military equipment to Sri Lanka.
  • Committee recommended negotiating with Sri Lanka to minimize sentences for arrested Indian fishermen and replacing trawlers with deep-sea vessels.
  • Committee recommended establishing a coordination mechanism to verify refugee data and facilitate repatriation of approximately 89,000 Sri Lankan refugees in India.
  • Committee recommended providing livelihood support, education, and employment opportunities to refugees.
  • Committee recommended extending Overseas Citizenship cards to Indian Origin Tamils.
  • Committee recommended addressing implementation challenges of the Sri Lanka Unique Digital Identity Project regarding sovereignty, data privacy, and security in a time-bound manner.

Also in the document

  • Bilateral trade is unbalanced in India’s favour, with India’s exports at USD 5.52 billion compared to Sri Lanka’s USD 1.66 billion.
  • India is one of the largest sources of FDI in Sri Lanka, with cumulative investment of USD 2.9 billion as of December 2025.
  • Indian tourists account for 22.5% of total arrivals in Sri Lanka in 2025.
  • Approximately 89,000 Sri Lankan refugees, mostly Tamils, were residing in India as of June 2025.
  • The Sri Lankan government is yet to take a position on the proposed 30 km bridge linking India to Sri Lanka’s ports.
  • The Trincomalee oil tank farms project is described as stalled.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Parliamentary Standing Committee reports (via PRS Legislative Research)

Committee report · Ref. india-sri-lanka-relations-and-the-way-ahead

Committee report 0.2 MB Open the document On prsindia.org ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.