Parliament Parliament of India
Bill adds theft, misappropriation of railway property as punishable offences
This Bill amends the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966, to explicitly include theft and dishonest misappropriation of railway property as punishable offences.
It also expands the scope of punishment to cover those who abet or conspire in such crimes and allows inquiry officers to start investigations upon receiving information about an offence, not just after an arrest.
Who it concerns: Individuals who steal, misappropriate, or unlawfully possess railway property; owners or occupiers of land/buildings who connive at such offences; and persons who abet or conspire in the commission of these offences.
What the bill does
- Section 3 is amended to explicitly punish 'theft' and 'dishonest misappropriation' of railway property, defining these terms by reference to the Indian Penal Code.
- Section 4 is amended to punish anyone who 'abets or conspires' in the commission of an offence under the Act, in addition to owners or occupiers who connive at such offences.
- Section 8 is amended to allow an officer of the Railway Protection Force to proceed with an inquiry when they receive information about the commission of an offence, not only when a person is arrested.
Also in the document
- The Bill is an amendment to an existing Act from 1966.
- The definitions of 'theft', 'dishonest misappropriation', 'abet', and 'conspire' are linked to specific sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Where this bill is now: Became law (Act)
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Parliament of India — Bills (Lok Sabha & Rajya Sabha)
Bill / law · Ref. LXIX · 22 Dec 2011
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.