Saturday, 7 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Parliament Parliamentary Committee

DDU-GKY spent ₹978 crore of ₹10,115 crore approved budget

The Standing Committee on Rural Development examined the impact of three key schemes—DDU-GKY, DAY-NRLM, and RSETIs—aimed at rural skilling, livelihoods, and migration.

978 croreDDU-GKY actual expenditure was Rs 978 crore against an approved budget of Rs 10,115 crore for 2021-26.

Who it concerns: Ministry/Department: Department of Rural Development (DoRD). Public Affected: Rural youth, Self-Help Group (SHG) members (particularly women), and residents of backward and aspirational districts.

What the committee found

  • Placement Gaps: Committee noted that only 67% (12 lakhs out of 18 lakhs) of DDU-GKY candidates were placed as of March 2026, with high dropout rates due to low salaries. Recommended ensuring near 100% placement, establishing district-level placement cells, and evaluating agencies based on long-term retention.
  • Budget Underutilisation: Committee flagged that DDU-GKY’s approved budget of Rs 10,115 crore (2021-26) was reduced to a revised estimate of Rs 1,162 crore, with actual expenditure of only Rs 978 crore. Recommended reviewing bottlenecks, timely fund release via direct benefit transfer, and aligning budgets with absorption capacity.
  • SHG Credit and Markets: Committee found credit linkage per SHG group is inadequate. Recommended scaling up credit flows, expediting the Lakhpati Didi initiative, and developing marketing networks through e-commerce and corporate partnerships.
  • RSETI Expansion: Committee noted the existing 636 RSETIs are insufficient and often located far from villages. Recommended expanding coverage to every district, establishing block-level sub-centres, and aligning curricula with local economic opportunities.
  • Female Participation: Committee observed low female participation in formal skilling due to distance, safety, and lack of childcare. Recommended women-only batches, mobile training units, and crèche facilities.
  • Regional Disparities: Committee noted wide inter-state variations in performance. Recommended a need-based fund allocation formula and targeted support for lagging states including Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Odisha, and the North-East.

Also in the document

  • DDU-GKY actual expenditure was Rs 978 crore against an approved budget of Rs 10,115 crore for 2021-26.
  • Only 67% of the 18 lakh candidates trained under DDU-GKY were placed as of March 2026.
  • As of May 2026, only 636 RSETIs are operational, covering 623 districts across 27 states and six union territories.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Parliamentary Standing Committee reports (via PRS Legislative Research)

Committee report · Ref. rural-skilling-and-migration-impact-study-of-schemes

Committee report 0.2 MB Open the document On prsindia.org ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.