Parliament Parliament Q&A
Dropout data missing for secondary students, ministry says
The question asked the Ministry of Minority Affairs to provide enrollment and dropout percentages for minority students compared to general students across primary, upper primary, secondary, higher secondary, and higher education levels…
The question asked the Ministry of Minority Affairs to provide enrollment and dropout percentages for minority students compared to general students across primary, upper primary, secondary, higher secondary, and higher education levels for the last five years, disaggregated by religion. The Ministry responded by providing aggregate data for the six notified minority communities and explaining data limitations regarding religious disaggregation and dropout metrics.
Asked and answered by: Asked by Shri Sachithanantham R; Answered by the Ministry of Minority Affairs (Minister Shri Kiren Rijiju).
What the government said
- UDISE+ records minority enrollment as an aggregate of six notified communities (Muslim, Christian, Sikh, Buddhist, Parsi, Jain) and does not maintain figures disaggregated by religion.
- UDISE+ maintains dropout rates only at the aggregate level and does not capture dropout rates separately for the Secondary level.
- AISHE records higher education enrollment for 'Muslim' and 'Other Minority Communities' (Christian, Sikh, Buddhist, Parsi, Jain combined) but does not capture dropout or attrition data.
- The government states that there is no concept of dropout in higher education due to student mobility between courses and programs.
Also in the document
- The answer explicitly states that the requested data is not available disaggregated by religion for school education, as UDISE+ only tracks the aggregate of the six notified minority groups.
- The answer notes that dropout data is not captured for the Secondary level in UDISE+.
- The answer states that AISHE does not capture dropout or attrition data for Higher Education Institutions, citing the lack of a 'dropout' concept in that sector.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Parliament of India — Questions & Answers (Lok Sabha, starred)
Question to govt · Ref. LS Q141 (Session 8) · 29 Jul 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.