Saturday, 7 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Parliament Parliament Q&A

No direct Belapur-Parli railway line, government confirms

The MP asked the Ministry of Railways whether a decision was taken to suspend the 104-year-old Belapur-Parli railway line, the reasons for it, and if it would be revived or reviewed with local representatives.

236 KmThe Daund-Manmad Doubling project (236 Km, ₹3,426 crore) has been commissioned.

Asked and answered by: Asked by Shri Bhausaheb Rajaram Wakchaure; Answered by the Ministry of Railways (Minister Shri Ashwini Vaishnaw).

What the government said

  • The government states there is no direct railway line between Belapur and Parli.
  • Belapur is an existing station on the Manmad-Belapur-Ahilyanagar section, connected to Parli via Parbhani, Jalna, and Manmad.
  • The Daund-Manmad Doubling project (236 Km, ₹3,426 crore) has been commissioned.
  • The Ahilyanagar-Beed-Parli Vaijnath section (201 Km) has been commissioned.
  • Work has been taken up on the balance section of the Ahilyanagar-Beed-Parli Vaijnath project (total 261 Km, ₹5,800 crore).
  • The Rahuri-Shani Shignapur New Line (22 Km, ₹494 crore) and Puntamba-Sainagar Shirdi Doubling (17 Km, ₹227 crore) are declared Special Railway Projects for Land Acquisition.
  • Surveys are completed or in progress for four new lines including Nashik Road-Sainagar Shirdi and Pune-Ahilyanagar.
  • Budget allocation for infrastructure in Maharashtra increased from ₹1,171 crore/year (2009-14) to ₹23,926 crore (2026-27).
  • As of 01.04.2026, 52 projects totaling 5,956 km and costing ₹1,42,635 crore are sanctioned in Maharashtra.
  • The Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail (MAHSR) project is under execution with 4.8 km of the under-sea tunnel completed in Maharashtra.

Also in the document

  • The answer does not explicitly confirm or deny a decision to suspend the Belapur-Parli line, instead clarifying that no direct line exists and listing alternative connectivity projects.
  • The answer does not address the specific public agitation and hunger strike mentioned in part (b) of the question.
  • The answer does not provide a specific timeline for the revival or completion of the mentioned projects, stating that timelines depend on appraisals and approvals.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Parliament of India — Questions & Answers (Lok Sabha, starred)

Question to govt · Ref. LS Q151 (Session 8) · 29 Jul 2026

Parliamentary Q&A 29 Jul 2026 · 0.3 MB Open the document On sansad.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.