Saturday, 7 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Parliament Parliament Q&A

NH65 upgradation: cost and timeline premature, DPR work ongoing

The question asked by Shri Kesineni Sivanath sought information on the upgradation of National Highway-65 connecting Pune to Machilipatnam, specifically regarding expansion plans, progress, funding, and timelines, answered by the Ministry…

The question asked by Shri Kesineni Sivanath sought information on the upgradation of National Highway-65 connecting Pune to Machilipatnam, specifically regarding expansion plans, progress, funding, and timelines, answered by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways.

Asked and answered by: Shri Kesineni Sivanath (asked), Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (answered)

What the government said

  • Development of National Highways is a continuous process
  • Decision for project implementation based on DPR, connectivity, traffic density, and PM Gati Shakti National Master Plan
  • Status of Pune-Machilipatnam stretch annexed
  • Premature to indicate cost/timeline of the project
  • Bids for consultancy work for DPR preparation invited for Pune-Solapur Package-1 and Package-2
  • Bids for DPR preparation invited for Solapur-Maharashtra/Karnataka Border corridor
  • DPR work for 6-lane access-controlled highway prepared for Sangareddy-Hyderabad and Hyderabad-Nandigama stretches
  • DPR work for 6-lane access-controlled highway prepared for Andhra Pradesh stretches

Also in the document

  • The government states it is premature to indicate cost/timeline for the project
  • The annexure lists specific stretches with status, including bids invited for DPR preparation and DPR work completed for certain sections

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Parliament of India — Questions & Answers (Lok Sabha, starred)

Question to govt · Ref. LS Q180 (Session 8) · 30 Jul 2026

Parliamentary Q&A 30 Jul 2026 · 0.4 MB Open the document On sansad.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.