Saturday, 7 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Parliament Parliament Q&A

Central Road Fund: Maharashtra's 18 Shirdi roads not prioritized, no timeline given

The MP asked the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways whether the government had received a proposal for 18 roads in Shirdi constituency under the Central Road Fund and if special financial approval would be granted.

330 CroreThe written request for 18 roads costing Rs. 330 Crore in Shirdi constituency has been forwarded to the State Gover…

The ministry replied that its role is limited to approving projects prioritized by State Governments and that the specific request has been forwarded to the Maharashtra State Government.

Asked and answered by: Asked by Shri Bhausaheb Rajaram Wakchaure; Answered by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (Minister Shri Nitin Jairam Gadkari).

What the government said

  • The Central Government's role is limited to approving lists of projects prioritized by State Governments/UTs under the PM Gati Shakti framework.
  • Approval is based on the accrual of the State/UT and outstanding committed liabilities (Bank of Sanction).
  • The written request for 18 roads costing Rs. 330 Crore in Shirdi constituency has been forwarded to the State Government of Maharashtra.
  • As of the date of the answer, the State Government of Maharashtra has not recommended a priority list of State Road projects under CRIF that includes these specific projects.

Also in the document

  • The answer does not provide a specific timeline for when the tender process will be initiated, as the projects have not yet been included in the State's priority list.
  • The answer does not directly address the condition of the roads or the difficulties faced by devotees, focusing instead on the procedural mechanism for fund allocation.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Parliament of India — Questions & Answers (Lok Sabha, starred)

Question to govt · Ref. LS Q264 (Session 8) · 6 Aug 2026

Parliamentary Q&A 6 Aug 2026 · 0.5 MB Open the document On sansad.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.