Parliament Parliament Q&A
Commercial tribunals case backlog rises sharply, Supreme Court rules on reforms
The question asked the Ministry of Law and Justice to provide details on the functioning, vacancies, pendency, and disposal rates of commercial tribunals, as well as steps taken to improve efficiency.
The government responded by citing Supreme Court findings and providing data on staffing and case statistics.
Asked and answered by: Asked by Shri Manish Tewari; Answered by Shri Arjun Ram Meghwal, Minister of State (Independent Charge) of the Ministry of Law and Justice.
What the government said
- Supreme Court judgment dated 19.11.2025 in Madras Bar Association vs. UOI regarding Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021.
- ITAT vacancies: 46 Chairperson/Member posts vacant in 2024-25, reducing to 14 by 2026-27.
- NCLT vacancies: 12 Chairperson/Member posts and 253 Registry staff vacant as on 03.08.2026.
- NCLAT vacancies: 1 Chairperson/Member post and 85 Registry staff vacant as on 30.06.2026.
- DRT status: 7 out of 39 Debt Recovery Tribunals are vacant, with Presiding Officers of other DRTs assigned additional charge.
- ITAT pendency increased from 38,759 cases in 2024-25 to 68,018 cases by 30.06.2026.
- NCLT pendency decreased from 21,664 cases in 2023-24 to 14,813 cases in 2025-26.
- Measures include strengthening digital infrastructure, e-Office adoption, video conferencing hearings, and online case management systems.
Also in the document
- The answer does not directly address the proposal for a 'National Tribunals Commission' mentioned in part (e) of the question, instead listing existing legislative and procedural measures.
- ITAT case pendency figures show a significant increase over the three-year period, rising from 38,759 to 68,018 cases.
- The government states it is making efforts to fill vacancies but does not provide a specific timeline for filling the 253 vacant registry positions at NCLT.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Parliament of India — Questions & Answers (Lok Sabha, starred)
Question to govt · Ref. LS Q293 (Session 8) · 7 Aug 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.