Parliament Parliament Q&A
40 projects sanctioned for ₹3295.76 crore under tourism initiative
The question asked the Ministry of Tourism to provide details on the review, institutional framework, project status, and impact assessment of the SASCI – Development of Iconic Tourist Centres to Global Scale initiative, with specific…
The question asked the Ministry of Tourism to provide details on the review, institutional framework, project status, and impact assessment of the SASCI – Development of Iconic Tourist Centres to Global Scale initiative, with specific references to Jharkhand and Karnataka.
Asked and answered by: Asked by Shri Bhartruhari Mahtab and Shri Chandra Prakash Choudhary; Answered by the Ministry of Tourism (Minister Shri Gajendra Singh Shekhawat).
What the government said
- 40 projects were sanctioned across 23 States in FY 2024-25 with 100% central funding totaling ₹3295.76 Crore.
- Two projects in Karnataka were sanctioned: 'Ecotourism & Cultural Hub at Roerich and Devika Rani Estate Tataguni in Bengaluru' (₹99.17 Crore sanctioned, 12% physical progress) and 'Development of Savadatti Yallammagudda in Belgavi' (₹100.00 Crore sanctioned, 0% physical progress).
- The Jharkhand project 'Eco-Tourism Development of Tilaiyya in Koderma' is listed as 'Stalled' with 0% physical progress and no expected completion date.
- For FY 2025-26, Special Assistance of ₹250 Crore each was sanctioned and released to Nagaland, Mizoram, and Himachal Pradesh under amended SASCI guidelines.
- A National Institutional Framework comprising the Central Sanctioning and Monitoring Committee (CSMC) and Mission Directorate (MD) is used for coordination, involving ministries of Culture, Housing, Civil Aviation, and others.
- A Program Management Information System (PMIS) has been developed as a unified digital platform for monitoring destination development schemes.
- The government stated that comprehensive impact on tourism growth and employment will be assessable progressively after project completion and operational stabilization.
Also in the document
- The annexure explicitly lists the Jharkhand project as 'Stalled' with 0% physical progress, while most other projects are marked as 'Ongoing' or 'Not Started'.
- The answer does not provide specific details on the 'review' findings requested in part (a), instead providing general information about guidelines and sanctions.
- The government noted that the impact assessment mechanism is not yet fully applicable because projects are at different stages of implementation.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
⚠ Figures not confirmed. Our automated check could not find every number in this summary in the document. Treat the figures with care and check the original.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
This document is in our archive but is not shown on our front pages: a number in the summary could not be found in the document.
The original document
Parliament of India — Questions & Answers (Lok Sabha, starred)
Question to govt · Ref. LS Q315 (Session 8) · 10 Aug 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.