Parliament Parliament Q&A
VB-G RAM G Act 2025 guarantees 125 days of wage employment annually
The question asked the Ministry of Rural Development to clarify if MGNREGS has been replaced by the new VB-G RAM G scheme, address concerns regarding the shift in financial burden to States, and confirm if the statutory right to work has…
The question asked the Ministry of Rural Development to clarify if MGNREGS has been replaced by the new VB-G RAM G scheme, address concerns regarding the shift in financial burden to States, and confirm if the statutory right to work has been diluted.
Asked and answered by: Asked by Shri Manickam Tagore B and Shri Vijayakumar Alias Vijay Vasanth; Answered by the Ministry of Rural Development (Minister Shri Shivraj Singh Chouhan).
What the government said
- MGNREGA Act 2005 was repealed and VB-G RAM G Act 2025 implemented from 1st July 2026.
- The new scheme guarantees 125 days of wage employment per year, compared to 100 days under MGNREGS.
- Fund sharing is 90:10 (Centre:State) for North Eastern, Himalayan States, and specific UTs, and 60:40 for all other States and UTs with legislature.
- Central share provision for FY 2026-27 is ₹95,692.31 crore, with a total programme outlay likely to exceed ₹1.51 lakh crore.
- Financial sanctions of ₹25,844.97 crore have been issued to States/UTs as the first instalment.
- Over 9.69 Crore person-days of employment were generated within one month of rollout.
Also in the document
- The government states that the 60:40 funding pattern is consistent with the broader framework of Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS).
- The government asserts that the transition was 'smooth, seamless and worker-centric' and that the new Act 'retains and strengthens' the rights-based nature of wage employment.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
⚠ Figures not confirmed. Our automated check could not find every number in this summary in the document. Treat the figures with care and check the original.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
This document is in our archive but is not shown on our front pages: a number in the summary could not be found in the document.
The original document
Parliament of India — Questions & Answers (Lok Sabha, starred)
Question to govt · Ref. LS Q323 (Session 8) · 11 Aug 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.