Saturday, 7 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Parliament Parliament Q&A

No district-wise rural infrastructure details provided in Maharashtra

The question asked the Ministry of Rural Development to state whether it has reviewed major rural development schemes in Maharashtra over the last three years, provide details on housing, employment, and livelihoods, and outline steps…

The question asked the Ministry of Rural Development to state whether it has reviewed major rural development schemes in Maharashtra over the last three years, provide details on housing, employment, and livelihoods, and outline steps taken to strengthen rural infrastructure and empower Self-Help Groups.

Asked and answered by: Asked by Shri Mohite Patil Dhairyasheel Rajsinh and Smt. Supriya Sule; Answered by the Ministry of Rural Development (Minister Shri Shivraj Singh Chouhan).

What the government said

  • Schemes are reviewed through mechanisms including Performance Review Committee Meetings, National Level Monitors, and Concurrent Evaluation Studies.
  • A comprehensive review of schemes, including for Maharashtra, was conducted during the Rashtriya Gramin Vikas Sammelan on 28-29 June 2026.
  • End-to-end digital solutions have been operationalized for real-time monitoring and transparency.
  • Under PMAY-G (FY2023-24 to FY2025-26): 27,84,062 houses sanctioned, 7,87,654 completed, and ₹11,688.72 crore central fund released.
  • Under MGNREGS (FY2023-24 to FY2025-26): 43.4 crore person-days generated, 14,07,512 assets created, and ₹14,981.35 crore central fund released.
  • Under DAY-NRLM (FY2023-24 to FY2025-26): 1,19,129 SHGs promoted, 12,50,855 households mobilized, and ₹2,938.52 crore central fund released.
  • State Governments, including Maharashtra, are responsible for identifying beneficiaries, conceiving project proposals, and prioritizing districts based on actual requirements.

Also in the document

  • The answer states that the Government has not directly identified specific districts requiring additional support, noting instead that State Governments are responsible for prioritizing areas based on actual requirements.
  • The answer does not provide district-wise details for the steps taken to strengthen rural infrastructure, as requested in part (d) of the question.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Parliament of India — Questions & Answers (Lok Sabha, starred)

Question to govt · Ref. LS Q336 (Session 8) · 11 Aug 2026

Parliamentary Q&A 11 Aug 2026 · 0.4 MB Open the document On sansad.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.