Saturday, 7 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Parliament Parliamentary Committee

₹404 crore unutilised in SAUBHAGYA scheme, CAG finds

The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) audited the implementation of two central government schemes, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gram Jyoti Yojana (DDUGJY) and Pradhan Mantri Sahaj Bijli Har Ghar Yojana (SAUBHAGYA), to assess their…

404 croreUnder SAUBHAGYA, Rs 404 crore of the Rs 500 crore raised through extra budgetary borrowing remained unutilised as o…

The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) audited the implementation of two central government schemes, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gram Jyoti Yojana (DDUGJY) and Pradhan Mantri Sahaj Bijli Har Ghar Yojana (SAUBHAGYA), to assess their performance, quality assurance, and financial management in providing rural electricity.

Who it concerns: Ministry of Power, Rural Electrification Corporation (REC), and State Distribution Companies (DISCOMs); affects rural households and agricultural consumers in India.

What the committee found

  • CAG found that 82% of DDUGJY projects were delayed in award and 92% in completion, with 47% delayed by more than two years.
  • CAG noted that the Ministry of Power did not conduct feasibility studies and Detailed Project Reports (DPRs) were prepared without field surveys, violating guidelines.
  • CAG identified that 1.09 lakh out of 6.13 lakh defects flagged by REC under DDUGJY were not resolved on time.
  • CAG observed that SAUBHAGYA declared 100% target achievement by March 2019, but seven states still reported 19 lakh unelectrified households at that time.
  • CAG found that REC appointed Quality Monitors in May and October 2019, after the scheme's completion deadline of March 2019, defeating the purpose of monitoring.
  • CAG recommended that the Ministry of Power conduct feasibility studies and field surveys before sanctioning work and preparing DPRs.
  • CAG recommended stricter quality checks and monitoring mechanisms at both DISCOM and REC levels.
  • CAG recommended that REC raise extra budgetary borrowing (EBR) funds only as per assessed requirements, noting that Rs 404 crore remained unutilised.

Also in the document

  • Under DDUGJY, the target of reducing power distribution losses was not achieved in 13 out of 26 states and UTs.
  • Under SAUBHAGYA, Rs 404 crore of the Rs 500 crore raised through extra budgetary borrowing remained unutilised as of March 2021.
  • In 224 of 479 SAUBHAGYA projects across 21 states, DISCOMs did not prepare comprehensive quality assurance plans.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Parliamentary Standing Committee reports (via PRS Legislative Research)

Committee report · Ref. deen-dayal-upadhyaya-gram-jyoti-yojana-and-pradhan-mantri-sahaj-bijli-har-ghar-y

Committee report 0.2 MB Open the document On prsindia.org ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.