Effective Capital Outlay and Capital Expenditure
Plain-language summary (AI-generated) — a quick read so you don't have to open the full PDF. May contain errors; the original document below is authoritative.
What was asked, and of whom?
The question asked for details on capital expenditure allocations and trends from 2004-14 and 2014-26, addressed by the Ministry of Finance.
Who asked / answered
Shri Rahul Singh Lodhi, Shri Ravindra Shukla Alias Ravi Kishan (asked); Ministry of Finance (answered)
What the government said
- 2004-14: ₹12.39 lakh crore capital expenditure
- 2014-26: ₹64.70 lakh crore capital expenditure
- 2004-14 effective capital expenditure: ₹17.04 lakh crore
- 2014-26 effective capital expenditure: ₹90.87 lakh crore
- Capex/GDP for 2023-24: 3.2%
- PM GatiShakti National Master Plan
- National Logistics Policy
- PM GatiShakti Public Platform
Points worth noting
- FY 2025-26 capex/GDP is provisional at 3.1%
- Grants-in-aid for capital assets started being separately depicted from FY 2010-11
- Effective capital expenditure includes grants-in-aid for assets like school buildings and houses under schemes
| Source body | Parliament of India — Questions & Answers (Lok Sabha, starred) |
| Reference number | LS Q4 (Session 8) |
| Status | closed (section: question) |
| Year | 20.0 |
| Closing date | — |
| Documents | 1 |
Highlights & Points worth asking
Auto-generated, neutral observations. Auto-generated from public documents. May contain errors. Not legal or financial advice. Always verify against the linked original document. KaunZimmedar is a platform, not an authority.
No automated observations for this document. Read the documents below directly.
Documents
The original government PDF is the authoritative source — shown below, or open it full-screen in a new tab.
Question
20.07.2026
ls18s8-q4.pdf
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Discussion (0)
Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.
Open discussion (0) →