Parliament Parliament Q&A
PM MITRA parks claim ₹68,590 crore investment but scheme outlay is ₹4,445 crore
The MP asked the Ministry of Textiles for details on the number, funding, and operational status of textile parks established under central schemes, and whether new schemes are planned for MSMEs and traditional clusters.
Asked and answered by: Asked by Shri G Lakshminarayana; Answered by the Ministry of Textiles (Minister Shri Giriraj Singh).
What the government said
- 7 PM MITRA Parks approved with a scheme outlay of Rs. 4,445 Crore for 2021-22 to 2027-28.
- PM MITRA sites finalized in Tamil Nadu, Telangana, Gujarat, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, and Maharashtra.
- Scheme for Integrated Textile Park (SITP) implemented until 31.03.2021, now subsumed under Textile Cluster Development Scheme (TCDS).
- 50 SITP projects sanctioned, of which 33 are completed.
- Union Budget 2026-27 announced an Integrated Program including the Textile Expansion and Employment Scheme to modernize traditional clusters.
- Bharat Audyogik Vikas Yojna (BHAVYA) approved with an outlay of ₹33,660 crores for 2026-27 to 2031-32 to develop 100 plug-and-play industrial parks.
Also in the document
- The answer states that the SITP scheme was in implementation only up to 31.03.2021 and is now subsumed under TCDS for completing ongoing projects.
- The answer does not provide specific manufacturing output or export figures for the parks, only employment and operational unit counts in the annexures.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Parliament of India — Questions & Answers (Lok Sabha, starred)
Question to govt · Ref. LS Q39 (Session 8) · 21 Jul 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.