Parliament Parliament Q&A
MTNL reports ₹3,101.50 crore net loss in FY 2025-26 despite positive EBITDA
The question asked the Ministry of Communications for details on financial and administrative measures taken to revive MTNL, including specific financial data and future restructuring plans.
40,000 croreThe answer notes that MTNL's total liabilities (approx. Rs. 40,000 crore) are lower than its non-core asset value (…
The government responded with a statement outlining the measures taken and providing year-wise financial figures.
Asked and answered by: Asked by Shri Arvind Ganpat Sawant; Answered by the Minister of Communications and Development of North Eastern Region (Shri Jyotiraditya M. Scindia).
What the government said
- Restructuring of high-cost debt via Sovereign Guarantee Bonds (SGB) of Rs. 24,071 crore.
- Budgetary support of Rs. 4,327 crore for the Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS).
- Financial support of Rs. 3,657.05 crore for servicing SGB interest payments.
- Transfer of operational activities to BSNL via a service agreement.
- Monetisation of MTNL assets to pay liabilities.
- MTNL has remained EBITDA-positive since FY 2020-21.
- EBITDA improved from Rs. 43 crore in FY 2023-24 to Rs. 437 crore in FY 2025-26.
- Total liabilities stood at Rs. 40,008.52 crore in FY 2025-26.
- MTNL holds approximately Rs. 50,000 crore in non-core assets (market value).
- The government stated it is not considering any new restructuring plan in the near future.
Also in the document
- The answer explicitly states 'No, sir' to the question regarding new restructuring plans.
- The financial table shows a net loss of Rs. 3,101.50 crore in FY 2025-26 despite positive EBITDA.
- The answer notes that MTNL's total liabilities (approx. Rs. 40,000 crore) are lower than its non-core asset value (approx. Rs. 50,000 crore).
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Parliament of India — Questions & Answers (Lok Sabha, starred)
Question to govt · Ref. LS Q42 (Session 8) · 22 Jul 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.