कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar
BrowseQA › question to govt

Development of Lalpur Airstrip

QA closed 23.0
Plain-language summary (AI-generated) — a quick read so you don't have to open the full PDF. May contain errors; the original document below is authoritative.

What was asked, and of whom?

The question asked by Smt. Himadri Singh to the Ministry of Civil Aviation sought details on the development of Lalpur Airstrip in Shahdol district, Madhya Pradesh, including proposals, feasibility studies, inclusion under RCS-UDAN, tenders, and timelines.

Who asked / answered

Smt. Himadri Singh (asked), Ministry of Civil Aviation (answered)

What the government said

  • Shahdol airstrip included in tentative list of unserved airports under RCS-UDAN
  • No technical survey or feasibility study conducted by Airports Authority of India
  • Next phase of UDAN Scheme launched on 04.07.2026
  • Challenge Mode framework for State Governments to nominate airstrips
  • Proposals evaluated based on land availability, infrastructure readiness, technical and operational feasibility, traffic potential, statutory clearances, and State Government support
Source bodyParliament of India — Questions & Answers (Lok Sabha, starred)
Reference numberLS Q68 (Session 8)
Statusclosed (section: question)
Year23.0
Closing date
Documents1

Highlights & Points worth asking

Auto-generated, neutral observations. Auto-generated from public documents. May contain errors. Not legal or financial advice. Always verify against the linked original document. KaunZimmedar is a platform, not an authority.

No automated observations for this document. Read the documents below directly.

Documents

The original government PDF is the authoritative source — shown below, or open it full-screen in a new tab.

Question 23.07.2026 ls18s8-q68.pdf
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →