Direct Benefit Transfer System
Plain-language summary (AI-generated) — a quick read so you don't have to open the full PDF. May contain errors; the original document below is authoritative.
What was asked, and of whom?
The question asked whether the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) system was implemented in the fertilizer sector in Telangana and sought details on its implementation, coverage, and future plans. The Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers provided the answer.
Who asked / answered
Shri Madhavaneni Raghunandan Rao, Shri Naba Charan Majhi (asked); Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers (answered)
What the government said
- DBT implemented pan India including Telangana
- 746.57 LMT sold in 2025-26
- 2.87 Lakh active retailers
- 8.4 Crores beneficiary farmers
- Rs. 2.17 Lakh Crores subsidy paid
- 100% Aadhaar based authentication
- monthly ceiling of 50 bags per buyer
- Telangana: 2 Bags per Acre for Urea
- Jammu & Kashmir: 60 bags per buyer per season
- Framework for Fertilizer Sale in 40 districts of 20 States
- iFMS for real-time monitoring
Points worth noting
- Annexure I and II contain state/district-wise PoS device details
- No specific figures provided for Telangana's PoS devices in the answer text
- The answer states that the statement was laid on the table of the House
| Source body | Parliament of India — Questions & Answers (Lok Sabha, starred) |
| Reference number | LS Q87 (Session 8) |
| Status | closed (section: question) |
| Year | 24.0 |
| Closing date | — |
| Documents | 1 |
Highlights & Points worth asking
Auto-generated, neutral observations. Auto-generated from public documents. May contain errors. Not legal or financial advice. Always verify against the linked original document. KaunZimmedar is a platform, not an authority.
No automated observations for this document. Read the documents below directly.
Documents
The original government PDF is the authoritative source — shown below, or open it full-screen in a new tab.
Question
24.07.2026
ls18s8-q87.pdf
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Discussion (0)
Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.
Open discussion (0) →