Performance of PMKVY in Assam
Plain-language summary (AI-generated) — a quick read so you don't have to open the full PDF. May contain errors; the original document below is authoritative.
What was asked, and of whom?
The question asked about the performance of PMKVY in Assam during 2024-25 to 2025-26, specifically requesting details on trainees, completion rates, and sector-wise data, as well as steps taken for the East-West Corridor. The Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship provided the answer.
Who asked / answered
Shri Phani Bhusan Choudhury (asked), Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (answered)
What the government said
- PMKVY 4.0 implemented since FY 2022-23
- Assam: 6,767 trained in Food Processing, 3,590 in Logistics, 803 in Petrochemicals
- Sector-wise details provided in Annexure I
- CRP-EPs trained under RPL framework
- PM VIKAS Scheme implemented by Ministry of Minority Affairs
- ASDM reported training activities in FY 2024-25 & 2025-26
Points worth noting
- Placement and retention not applicable for CRP-EPs as they are existing entrepreneurs
- State-wise details of PM VIKAS funds not available
- Total trained in East-West Corridor sectors: 32,268 (Food Processing), 17,895 (Logistics), 5,875 (Petrochemicals)
| Source body | Parliament of India — Questions & Answers (Lok Sabha, starred) |
| Reference number | LS Q110 (Session 8) |
| Status | closed (section: question) |
| Year | 27.0 |
| Closing date | — |
| Documents | 1 |
Highlights & Points worth asking
Auto-generated, neutral observations. Auto-generated from public documents. May contain errors. Not legal or financial advice. Always verify against the linked original document. KaunZimmedar is a platform, not an authority.
No automated observations for this document. Read the documents below directly.
Documents
The original government PDF is the authoritative source — shown below, or open it full-screen in a new tab.
Question
27.07.2026
ls18s8-q110.pdf
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Discussion (0)
Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.
Open discussion (0) →