Sunday, 8 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Parliament Parliament Q&A

Tourism Ministry response lacks district-wise financial details for Tamil Nadu community tourism

The question asked the Ministry of Tourism to state whether steps have been taken to promote community-based tourism in Tamil Nadu, including details on schemes, financial assistance, and employment generation.

The Ministry of Tourism provided the official response.

Asked and answered by: Asked by: Shri Selvam G and Dr. Rani Srikumar; Answered by: Ministry of Tourism (Minister Shri Gajendra Singh Shekhawat).

What the government said

  • The Ministry stated that development of tourist destinations is primarily the responsibility of State Governments, with the Ministry complementing efforts through central schemes.
  • Total central assistance sanctioned for projects in Tamil Nadu is Rs. 390.74 Crores under schemes including Swadesh Darshan, PRASHAD, SASCI, and ACA.
  • Specific projects include the Chennai-Mamallapuram-Rameshwaram circuit (Rs. 73.13 Cr), Nandavanam Heritage Park (Rs. 99.67 Cr), and Eco Park at Ooty (Rs. 70.23 Cr).
  • The Swadesh Darshan 2.0 scheme encourages sustainable tourism, local community consultation, and employment generation for local youth and women.
  • The government approved the development of 1,000 tribal homestays under the Swadesh Darshan Scheme with support of up to Rs. 5 Lakh per unit for new construction.
  • Approximately 29,490 candidates were trained in Tamil Nadu under the Capacity Building for Service Providers (CBSP) scheme from 2014-15 to 2025-26.
  • Funds for fairs and festivals (e.g., Indian Dance Festival at Mamallapuram) were sanctioned annually, with amounts ranging from Rs. 8.00 Lakh to Rs. 50.00 Lakh between 2015-16 and 2025-26.

Also in the document

  • The answer does not provide district-wise details of financial assistance as requested in part (b) of the question, instead listing specific sanctioned projects.
  • The answer does not provide specific figures for the number of local artisans, self-help groups, or community organizations benefited, nor the exact employment generated, as requested in part (d).
  • The answer does not explicitly list 'further steps proposed' as requested in part (e), but describes ongoing schemes and initiatives like 'Paryatan Mitra' and 'Travel for LiFE'.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

⚠ Figures not confirmed. Our automated check could not find every number in this summary in the document. Treat the figures with care and check the original.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

This document is in our archive but is not shown on our front pages: a number in the summary could not be found in the document.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Parliament of India — Questions & Answers (Lok Sabha, starred)

Question to govt · Ref. LS Q113 (Session 8) · 27 Jul 2026

Parliamentary Q&A 27 Jul 2026 · 0.1 MB Open the document On sansad.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.