Saturday, 7 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Audits Comptroller & Auditor General

CAG finds 6% registration rate among 27 Rajasthan construction sites

This audit examined the implementation of the Building and Other Construction Workers (BOCW) Act and the management of the welfare fund in Rajasthan for the period 2017-18 to 2021-22.

30.10 lakhOnly 6% of employed workers at 27 verified establishments were actually registered, despite 30.10 lakh workers bein…

It assessed the registration of workers, collection of cess, safety compliance, and the utilization of funds for welfare schemes.

Who it concerns: Government of Rajasthan, specifically the Labour Department and the Rajasthan Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Board (RBOCW Board).

What the auditor found

  • Only 6% of employed workers at 27 verified establishments were actually registered, despite 30.10 lakh workers being registered in the state.
  • Delays of 3 to 22 months in transferring ₹1,789 crore of collected cess to the welfare fund.
  • Expenditure on welfare schemes ranged only from 21.16% to 51.06% of available funds; only ₹1,659.22 crore was expended out of ₹1,788.99 crore received as cess.
  • 30% of welfare scheme applications (7.79 lakh) remained pending, with 1.86 lakh pending for more than two years.
  • 89% of establishments issued compliance notices for safety violations did not furnish compliance.
  • RBOCW Board failed to submit audited annual accounts for 2018-19 to 2021-22 to the State Government.
  • Recommendations include filling vacant posts, improving cess collection methodology, and strengthening document verification for benefits.

Also in the document

  • CAG found that the Labour Department did not obtain lists of civil works from executing departments, leading to incomplete coverage of establishments required to register.
  • CAG noted that none of the liable establishments submitted a written statement of health and safety policy to the Chief Inspector.
  • CAG identified inadequate document verification in specific schemes (Prasuti Sahayata Yojana and Assistance to Silicosis affected workers), indicating a lack of due diligence.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Comptroller & Auditor General of India (CAG) — audit reports

Audit report · 2025

Audit report 2025 · 7.1 MB Open the document On cag.gov.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.