Tuesday, 3 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Audits Comptroller & Auditor General

CAG finds ₹18,799 crore income escaped tax in 589 unexplained cases

This audit examined the compliance of the Income Tax Department with provisions for taxing unexplained transactions (Sections 68-69D and 115BBE) in assessments completed between FY 2018-19 and 2022-23.

₹ 18,799 croreCAG found that in 589 cases involving ₹ 18,799 crore, Assessing Officers did not invoke provisions for unexplained…

Who it concerns: Union Government, Department of Revenue – Direct Taxes (Income Tax Department)

What the auditor found

  • Total tax effect of discrepancies identified: ₹ 25,085 crore across 1,902 audit observations.
  • Under-assessment/under-charge of tax in 1,728 cases amounting to ₹ 23,769 crore.
  • Over-assessment/over-charge of tax in 174 cases amounting to ₹ 1,316 crore.
  • Incorrect application of tax rate and surcharge in 926 cases with a tax effect of ₹ 4,707 crore.
  • Income not accurately taken to tax computation statements in 331 cases with a tax effect of ₹ 1,230 crore.
  • Incorrect set-off of losses against additions in 56 cases with a tax effect of ₹ 349 crore.
  • Unexplained transactions escaping assessment in 589 cases with a tax effect of ₹ 18,799 crore.
  • Department accepted/rectified issues in 1,643 cases (₹ 13,258 crore), did not accept in 39 cases (₹ 2,349 crore), and did not reply in 220 cases (₹ 9,478 crore).
  • Recommendations include reviewing potential assessment cases, implementing a foolproof IT system, fixing responsibility for errors, and issuing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for consistency.

Also in the document

  • CAG found that in 589 cases involving ₹ 18,799 crore, Assessing Officers did not invoke provisions for unexplained transactions despite the transactions being bogus or unexplained, resulting in income escaping assessment.
  • CAG noted that 1,777 out of the 1,902 cases reported were not reviewed by the Department's Internal Audit.
  • CAG observed that in 17 instances, internal audit was conducted only after the CAG's audit had already been completed, indicating prescribed procedures were not followed.
  • CAG stated that discrepancies suggest Assessing Officers did not exercise adequate due diligence in fulfilling statutory duties.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Comptroller & Auditor General of India (CAG) — audit reports

Audit report · Ref. Report No. 32 of 2026 · 2026

Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.