Tender Document for Conduct of CBT Mode Examination (For Candidate Count Less Than 1 Lac)
Plain-language summary (AI-generated) — a quick read so you don't have to open the full PDF. May contain errors; the original document below is authoritative.
What is this tender for?
The National Testing Agency (NTA) is contracting a company to conduct Computer-Based Tests (CBT) for various professional entrance and eligibility examinations, with candidate counts less than 1 lakh per examination.
Who can bid / win?
Not stated in the document
Key terms
- EMD: ₹1.0 Crore
- Tender Form Cost: Nil
- Bid Submission Deadline: 2025-03-13
- Contract Duration: Not stated
| Source body | National Testing Agency (NTA) |
| Reference number | NTA_CBT_1Lac/2025 |
| Status | closed (section: active) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Closing date | 2025-03-13 |
| Documents | 2 · changed 1× after publishing |
Highlights & Points worth asking
Auto-generated, neutral observations. Auto-generated from public documents. May contain errors. Not legal or financial advice. Always verify against the linked original document. KaunZimmedar is a platform, not an authority.
These are factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents below — not findings, opinions, or allegations of wrongdoing. Verify each against the linked original.
What we observed
- The department changed this document 1 time after first publishing it.
Points a citizen might reasonably ask
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?
Documents
The original government PDF is the authoritative source — shown below, or open it full-screen in a new tab.
Notice
2025-02-22
Tender_20250222122912.pdf
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 1
2025-03-06
Corrigendum_20250306215721.pdf
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Discussion (0)
Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.
Open discussion (0) →