Markets Securities & Exchange Board
SEBI finds 4 non-genuine trades in illiquid stock options
This order addresses SEBI's findings that Ararti Karmakar executed non-genuine reversal trades in illiquid stock options on the BSE, creating artificial volume.
It details the procedural history and the Adjudicating Officer's determination of violations under the PFUTP Regulations.
Who it concerns: Ararti Karmakar (PAN: BYKPK3038D); Sargam Lefins Pvt Ltd (identified as counterparty); Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE); SEBI
What SEBI found or ordered
- SEBI found that the Noticee executed 4 non-genuine trades in 2 stock option contracts (FEDB15MAR140.00PE and GRSM15MAR3850.00CE).
- These trades resulted in the creation of artificial volume totaling 2,71,750 units.
- The Adjudicating Officer proceeded ex-parte, presuming the allegations were admitted because the Noticee did not respond to the Show Cause Notice or appear for hearings.
- The order cites violations of Regulations 3(a), (b), (c), (d), 4(1), and 4(2)(a) of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003.
- The investigation period covered April 01, 2014, to September 30, 2015.
Also in the document
- SEBI noted that the Noticee's trades were executed with the same counterparty (Sargam Lefins Pvt Ltd) within seconds of each other on the same day, with significant price differences (e.g., buying at Rs 1 and selling at Rs 19).
- The order notes that the Noticee's artificial volume contributed 6.38% to 9.2% of the total market volume in the specific contracts involved.
- The Adjudicating Officer noted that multiple attempts to serve notices and hearing invitations were undelivered or the Noticee was unreachable, leading to the ex-parte decision.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) — enforcement orders
Regulatory order · Ref. Order/AK/GN/2026-27/32409 · 21 May 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.