Saturday, 7 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Markets Reserve Bank of India

RBI rejects prelam board substitution in office furniture tender

The Reserve Bank of India is contracting for the design, fabrication, supply, and installation of office furniture (modular workstations, desks, bookshelves, and storage) at its Main Office Building in Belapur and Primary Data Center in…

The Reserve Bank of India is contracting for the design, fabrication, supply, and installation of office furniture (modular workstations, desks, bookshelves, and storage) at its Main Office Building in Belapur and Primary Data Center in Kharghar.

Key terms

  • Tender Type: E-Tender
  • Pre-bid Meeting Date: November 02, 2026
  • Submission Platform: CPP portal
  • Required Annexures for Bid Submission: I, III, IV (if applicable), VII, VIII, and IX

Also in the document

  • Only one firm (M/s Durian Industries Limited) participated in the pre-bid meeting.
  • The Bank explicitly rejected a bidder's proposal to substitute specified materials (particle board/MDF) with 'prelam board', requiring strict adherence to the original technical specifications.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Reserve Bank of India (RBI)

Tender · Ref. 26116 · 5 Nov 2026

Corrigendum 1 5 Nov 2026 · 0.3 MB Open the document On rbidocs.rbi.org.in ↗
Read it here
Questions a citizen might ask

Observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations.

  • The department changed this document 1 time after first publishing it.
  • What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
  • Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
  • Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.