Markets Securities & Exchange Board
SEBI orders penalty for Pace Stock Broking over Axis Mutual Fund front-running
This is an adjudication order by SEBI regarding Pace Stock Broking Services Private Limited, examining allegations that the firm front-ran trades of Axis Mutual Fund and failed to maintain required IP address and user ID records.
Who it concerns: Pace Stock Broking Services Private Limited (the Noticee); Mr. Kaleeswaran Pandian (dealer); Mr. Rajeev Ranjan (trader); Axis Mutual Fund (affected entity).
What SEBI found or ordered
- SEBI investigated trades from April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2022, for suspected front-running of Axis Mutual Fund.
- SEBI alleged violations of SEBI (Stock Brokers) Regulations, 1992, and the SEBI Circular dated November 06, 2013, regarding the maintenance of IP addresses and user ID mappings.
- SEBI noted that Pace could not provide IP addresses mapped to specific user IDs for the trades in question.
- SEBI analyzed trades executed under a specific CTCL ID, noting a discrepancy where Mr. Kaleeswaran Pandian was listed as the approved person in exchange records, while Pace claimed Mr. Rajeev Ranjan operated the ID.
- Pace alleged the discrepancy was a clerical error and that Mr. Pandian had no involvement in the trading activities.
- The order cites sections 15A(a), 15A(c), and 15HB of the SEBI Act as the basis for potential penalties.
Also in the document
- The investigation period covers two financial years (2020-2022).
- The order details a specific dispute over the identity of the trader associated with a terminal ID, with SEBI relying on exchange records (NSE/BSE) that listed Mr. Pandian, while the broker attributed the trades to Mr. Ranjan.
- The document is an adjudication order, meaning SEBI is determining the penalty for the alleged violations rather than just investigating them.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) — enforcement orders
Regulatory order · Ref. Order/JS/RJ/2026-27/32501 · 22 Jul 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.