Monday, 9 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Courts Supreme Court

Supreme Court dismisses petition, upholds integrity of judicial officer

The case involves a Special Leave Petition filed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad against a final judgment in a writ petition concerning a Judicial Officer (Respondent No. 1).

The core issue was whether the High Court's decision, which upheld the officer's service record and integrity, should be interfered with by the Supreme Court.

Who it concerns: Petitioner: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Respondents: Manju Kumari & Anr.; Bench: Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi, Hon'ble Mrs. Justice V. Mohana.

What the court decided

  • The Court declined to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court.
  • The Special Leave Petition was dismissed.

Also in the document

  • The Court noted that the respondent Judicial Officer had earned good service records from 2013 to 2019 and again from 2020-2021 onwards.
  • The Court observed that nothing adverse had been found against the respondent.
  • The order is dated 03-11-2026.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments

Court order · Ref. SLP(C) No. 037568 - / 2026 · 8 Nov 2026

Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.