Wednesday, 4 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Courts Central Information Commission

MP High Court lets RTI applicant inspect records before requesting copies

This digest contains one notable Right to Information ruling from November 2026.

It covers a procedural question regarding an applicant's right to inspect records before requesting specific copies.

Who it concerns: The ruling concerns the Madhya Pradesh High Court and an RTI applicant who faced a delay of over 14 years in obtaining documents.

What was ruled

  • Inspection of records before seeking copies
  • Identification of specific documents
  • Substantial delay in disclosure

Also in the document

  • The Madhya Pradesh High Court permitted an RTI applicant to inspect relevant records before identifying the specific documents whose copies he seeks.
  • The court noted a substantial delay of over 14 years in the context of the ruling.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Right to Information — CIC & court rulings

RTI ruling · Ref. rti-2026-11 · 1 Nov 2026

RTI ruling 1 Nov 2026 On livelaw.in ↗

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.