Thursday, 1 October 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Markets Reserve Bank of India

RBI relaxes local presence rule for New Delhi X-ray scanner tender

The Reserve Bank of India is contracting for the design, supply, installation, testing, and commissioning of two X-Ray Baggage Scanner Systems for its Main Office Building in New Delhi.

Who can bid: Bidders must have an office in NCT of Delhi or in satellite towns (Noida, Ghaziabad, Gurugram, or Faridabad) with sufficient manpower to handle service during the Comprehensive Annual Maintenance Contract (CAMC). Bidders must submit documentary proof of this office presence. Other eligibility criteria are not stated in this document.

Key terms

  • Tender Number: 2026_RBI_290120_1
  • Invitation Date: September 11, 2026
  • Platform: CPP Portal

Also in the document

  • The corrigendum relaxes the local presence requirement from 'at least one year' to simply having an office at the time of bid submission.
  • The definition of acceptable local presence has been expanded to include satellite towns (Noida, Ghaziabad, Gurugram, and Faridabad) in addition to NCT of Delhi.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Reserve Bank of India (RBI)

Tender · Ref. 25901 · 1 Oct 2026

Corrigendum 1 1 Oct 2026 · 0.1 MB Open the document On rbidocs.rbi.org.in ↗
Read it here
Questions a citizen might ask

Observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations.

  • The department changed this document 1 time after first publishing it.
  • What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
  • Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
  • Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.