Friday, 25 September 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Courts Supreme Court

Supreme Court urges India to notify pending Commercial Courts Rules

The Supreme Court raised concerns about the delay in notifying the draft Commercial Courts Rules, 2021, specifically regarding the establishment of District Execution Cells to aid in the execution of decrees.

The Court sought information from the Union of India on the status of these rules and invited views from High Courts on establishing such cells under their supervisory jurisdiction.

Who it concerns: Petitioners: Periyamall (Dead thr. Lrs.) & Ors.; Respondents: V. Rajamani & Anr.; Bench: Justice J.B. Pardiwalla and Justice Pankaj Mithal.

What the court decided

  • The Court directed the Registry to inform Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Additional Solicitor General, to take instructions from the Ministry of Law and Justice regarding the status of the draft Commercial Courts Rules, 2021, and revert on the next hearing date.
  • The Court directed the Registry to forward a copy of the order to the Registrar General of all High Courts for placement before their respective Chief Justices.
  • The Court invited views from all High Courts on whether they should establish District Execution Cells under Article 227 of the Constitution if the Union of India does not notify the draft rules.
  • The matter was listed for this limited purpose on 19.08.2026.

Also in the document

  • The order was passed on May 25, 2026.
  • The Court noted that the draft Commercial Courts Rules, 2021, had not been notified as of the date of the order.
  • The Court expressed the view that establishing District Execution Cells in all Judicial Districts may help in the effective and expeditious disposal of execution petitions.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments

Court order · Ref. PERIYAMMAL (DEAD THR. LRS.) AND ORS Versus V. RAJAMANI AND ANR. ETC|SLP(C) No. 8490-8492/2020"}],"genre":"Top Stories", "interactivityType": · 24 Sep 2026

Order 24 Sep 2026 · 0.1 MB Open the document On livelaw.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.