Courts Supreme Court
Supreme Court stays specific paragraphs of High Court judgment in Medha Roopam case
This matter concerns a Special Leave Petition filed by Medha Roopam against Akriti Chaudhary and others, challenging a High Court judgment dated 02-09-2026.
The core issue before the Supreme Court is the grant of interim relief to stay the operation of specific paragraphs of the impugned judgment while the case is pending on merits.
Who it concerns: Petitioner: Medha Roopam; Respondents: Akriti Chaudhary & Ors.; Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh.
What the court decided
- Permission to file Special Leave Petition is granted.
- Notice is issued to the respondents.
- Respondents are granted two weeks' time to file their replies.
- The operation of the impugned judgment, particularly paragraph Nos. 27 to 33, is stayed until the matter is heard on merits.
- The matter is listed for hearing on 07.10.2026.
Also in the document
- The stay is interim in nature, applicable only until the matter is heard on merits.
- The Court specifically stayed paragraphs 27 to 33 of the impugned judgment rather than the entire order.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments
Court order · Ref. MEDHA ROOPAM v AKRITI CHAUDHARY AND ORS|Diary No. 56202-2026 | · 23 Sep 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.