Courts Ministry of Home Affairs
Supreme Court Commission finds six fake encounter cases in Manipur
This is a written response by the Minister of State in the Ministry of Home Affairs to a Lok Sabha question regarding the findings of a Supreme Court-appointed Commission on alleged fake encounters in Manipur.
It clarifies the government's awareness of the Commission's report and the National Human Rights Commission's (NHRC) stance on investigating these incidents.
Who it concerns: Ministry of Home Affairs, Supreme Court of India, Justice N. Santosh Hegde Commission, National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), State Government of Manipur, and the general public concerned with human rights and security force actions in Manipur.
What was decided
- The Supreme Court constituted a three-member Commission headed by Justice N. Santosh Hegde on 4.1.2013 to probe six cases of alleged fake encounters in Manipur.
- The Commission submitted its report to the Supreme Court on 1.4.2013.
- According to observations dated 8.4.2013 on the Supreme Court’s website, the Commission found that in all six examined cases, the killings amounted to fake encounters.
- The Commission’s report has not yet been made public by the Supreme Court, and the matter is sub-judice.
- The NHRC routinely directs State Governments to conduct enquiries on complaints of fake encounters but has not specifically demanded an investigation in view of the Justice Hegde Commission's findings.
- The question regarding the government's reaction to an NHRC demand does not arise because no such specific demand was made.
Also in the document
- The document notes that the Commission's report is not public and the matter is sub-judice.
- The NHRC's role is described as routine direction for enquiries on complaints, rather than a specific new demand triggered by the Hegde Commission's findings.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Courts & tribunals surfaced by CJP
Court / tribunal order · Ref. f631e242d3d881ab · 10 Jul 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.