Courts Foreigners Tribunal
Foreigners Tribunal rejects claim Md. Alam Khan is foreigner
This is an opinion and order issued by the Foreigners Tribunal (Barpeta, Assam) in a case where the Union of India alleged that Md.
Alam Khan was a foreigner. It matters to citizens as it determines the citizenship status of an individual under the Foreigners Act, 1946, based on evidence of residency and lineage prior to 1971.
Who it concerns: The document concerns Md. Alam Khan (Opposite Party/Proceedee), the Union of India (Petitioner), and the Foreigners Tribunal, Barpeta (Issuing Authority).
What was decided
- The Tribunal answered the reference in the negative, declaring Md. Alam Khan is not a foreigner.
- The Tribunal found that the Proceedee proved he and his family entered Assam prior to 25th March 1971.
- The Tribunal relied on certified copies of voter lists from 1965, 1970, 1997, 2005, 2010, 2019, and 2021, as well as a Gaonpradhan certificate and 1951 NRC entries for grandparents.
- The Tribunal noted that the Proceedee's parents' names appeared in the 1965 and 1970 voter lists, and his name appeared in the 1985 voter list.
- The Tribunal stated that the onus of proving citizenship lies upon the Proceedee under Section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946, and found this burden met.
Also in the document
- The case was originally forwarded by the Superintendent of Police (B), Barpeta, under IM(D)T Reference case no. 1371/2000.
- The case record was transferred to the Tribunal following a direction by the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 12/07/2005 in W.P.(C) 131 of 2000.
- No one appeared on behalf of the State/1st Party to adduce evidence during the proceedings.
- The Proceedee's mother, Jaytan Nessa, appeared as a witness and her evidence was found trustworthy by the Tribunal.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Courts & tribunals surfaced by CJP
Court / tribunal order · Ref. faa82aa10b31e510 · 27 Jul 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.