Supreme Court: Long possession alone does not prove adverse possession
This case concerns a dispute over the title and possession of agricultural land in Punjab, where the appellants (representing a religious institution) challenged the High Court's decision that favored the respondents (claiming title via a 1965 sale deed). The core issue is whether long possession recorded in revenue entries as 'Dharam-Arth' (religious/charitable) constitutes adverse possession or valid dedication.
Appellants: Bhag Singh (D) thr. Mahant Kashmir Singh; Respondents: Basant Kaur (D) thr. Lrs. and others; Bench: Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra.
- Allowed applications for substitution of legal representatives of deceased respondents, condoning delay and setting aside abatement.
- The document provided is truncated and does not contain the final operative order, relief granted, or final judgment of the Supreme Court.
Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.
The original document
Document details
| Official title | Long Possession Alone Does Not Prove Adverse Possession,Hostile Intent Essential : Supreme Court |
| Source body | Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments |
| Reference number | — |
| Status | closed (order) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Closing date | — |
| Documents | 1 |