कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

High Court issues full judgment in Jain temple management dispute

This case involves a dispute between the Swetambar and Digambar sects of the Jain community regarding the management and administration of the Mahaveerji Jain Temple in Sawai Madhopur. The core issue is whether the High Court correctly abated the proceedings under the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, when the original suit was filed under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959, seeking removal of the current management committee.

Petitioners/Appellants: Legal representatives of Narain Lal (deceased) and Shri Jain Swetambar (Moortipujak) Mahaveerji Tirth Raksha Samiti. Respondents: Prabandhkarini Committee, Digambar Jain Atishaya Kshetra, Shree Mahaveerji. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Gupta (High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur).

  • The High Court issued a full judgment on 20.02.2026.
  • The case concerns S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 611/1995 and connected appeal No. 575/1995.
  • The appeals challenge the trial court's order dated 27.10.1994, which abated the proceedings under Section 4 of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991.
  • The appellants argued that the abatement was illegal because the suit was under Section 40 of the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959, and did not seek conversion of the religious character of the place of worship.
  • The Supreme Court had previously directed the trial court to decide all issues under Section 40 of the 1959 Act, including the availability of relief.

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

The original document

Order 2026-09-09
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official title'Will Lord Be Pleased By This?' : Supreme Court To Jain Sects Litigating Over Mahaveer Ji Jain Temple Administration
Source bodySupreme Court of India — orders & judgments
Reference numberPRABANDHKARINI COMMITTEE DIGAMBAR JAIN ATISHYA KSHETRA ...",
Statusclosed (order)
Year2026
Closing date
Documents1

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →