कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

Supreme Court: Trial Court's Order Required Before Drug Disposal Committee Can Dispose Of Seized Vehicle

The case concerns the release of a lorry seized during a drug case where the accused were acquitted. The core issue is whether the Drug Disposal Committee (DDC) can dispose of the vehicle without a specific order from the Trial Court, and whether the vehicle should be returned to the owner given the acquittal.

Appellant: R Manimaran (owner of the vehicle); Respondent: State of Tamil Nadu; Bench: Justices J. B. Pardiwala and K. Vinod Chandran.

  • Supreme Court allowed the Criminal Appeal.
  • Set aside the order of the Trial Court rejecting the release of the vehicle.
  • Set aside the judgment of the High Court of Madras.
  • Ordered the release of the vehicle (TN-57-AQ-2165) to the Appellant.
  • Directed that if the vehicle was transmitted to the DDC, it must be released forthwith to the Appellant.
  • Held that the DDC cannot independently dispose of a seized vehicle pending criminal proceedings without proper orders from the Court.
  • Clarified that the power to confiscate lies with the Court under Section 63(1) of the NDPS Act, not the DDC.
  • Disposed of any pending applications.

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

The original document

Order 2026-09-03
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official titleNDPS Act | Drug Disposal Committee Cannot Dispose Of Seized Vehicle Without Trial Court's Orders : Supreme Court
Source bodySupreme Court of India — orders & judgments
Reference number
Statusclosed (order)
Year2026
Closing date2026-08-24
Documents1

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →