Supreme Court criticizes MCD, ASI for 'callousness' over heritage structure claims
The case involves a dispute over the preservation of heritage structures in Delhi, where the Court addressed contradictions between official affidavits filed by the MCD and ASI and newspaper reports showing damage or encroachment. The Court directed fresh inspections and show-cause notices to officials regarding these discrepancies.
Petitioner: Rajeev Suri; Respondents: Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) & Ors.; Bench: Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh.
- Directed the Additional Commissioner, South Delhi (MCD), Director General of ASI, and Head of the Archaeological Department (NCT Delhi) to file personal show-cause affidavits after fresh site inspections.
- Ordered the two contractors working on horticulture and civil works to coordinate and follow instructions from the Court Commissioner.
- Directed the Department of Archaeology to ensure upkeep and cleanliness of the toilet complex at the site.
- Substituted Respondent No. 13 as 'Vidya Bal Vihar' and ordered fresh notice and a report from ASI regarding Kharbooze ka Gumbad and Lal Gumbad.
- Required all parties to file revised factual reports based on fresh site inspections conducted in the presence of the Court Commissioner.
- Ordered the authority concerned to file a detailed affidavit regarding the settlement with the Aga Khan Trust for Sunder Nursery, including audit reports.
- Listed the matter for the next hearing on 07.10.2026 at 02:00 p.m.
Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.
The original document
Document details
| Official title | Supreme Court Pulls Up MCD, ASI As Newspaper Reports Contradict Claims Of Preserving Heritage Structures |
| Source body | Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments |
| Reference number | — |
| Status | active (order) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Closing date | 2026-10-07 |
| Documents | 1 |