Delhi High Court orders MP Govt to pay ₹78 lakh to senior advocate
This case involves a petition by a Senior Advocate and former Advocate General of Madhya Pradesh seeking the release of outstanding professional fees and interest for appearances before the Supreme Court of India on behalf of the State of Madhya Pradesh. The core issue is the State's refusal to pay the claimed dues despite the petitioner's recorded appearances in specific matters.
Petitioner: Anoop George Chaudhari (Senior Advocate); Respondent: State of Madhya Pradesh; Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sachin Datta (Delhi High Court).
- The Court directed the State of Madhya Pradesh to pay over ₹78 Lakhs in fees to the petitioner.
- The Court held that the State cannot deny payment after having taken legal services from the petitioner.
- The Court noted that the petitioner appeared on 14 dates before the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court.
- The Court observed that the State failed to file a counter-affidavit within the granted time, leading to the closure of its right to do so, though a late counter-affidavit was subsequently filed.
- The Court directed the Advocate General to convene a meeting with the then Chief Secretary and Standing Counsel to resolve the matter, which was held in November 2025.
Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.
The original document
Document details
| Official title | Delhi High Court Directs MP Govt To Pay Over ₹78 Lakhs Fee To Senior Advocate, Says State Can't Deny Payment After Taking Legal Services |
| Source body | Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments |
| Reference number | SLP (C) No. 9036/2016. The assertion that there is \"no record\" of the petitioner' |
| Status | closed (order) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Closing date | 2026-08-31 |
| Documents | 1 |