Saturday, 7 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Courts Supreme Court

Supreme Court maintains status quo on Matrix, Tianish, NP assets

The case involves Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority (RAKIA) seeking to enforce a UAE court decree against Nimmagadda Prasad (NP) and related entities (Matrix, Tianish, etc.) for alleged misappropriation of funds, while challenging the…

The case involves Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority (RAKIA) seeking to enforce a UAE court decree against Nimmagadda Prasad (NP) and related entities (Matrix, Tianish, etc.) for alleged misappropriation of funds, while challenging the dismissal of contempt proceedings and the approval of a merger between Matrix and Tianish.

Who it concerns: Appellants: Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority (RAKIA); Respondents: Matrix Pharmacorp Private Limited, Tianish Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., IQuest Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Moschip Technologies Ltd., and Nimmagadda Prasad (NP); Bench: Justice V. Mohana.

What the court decided

  • All appeals taken up and heard together.
  • Interim order dated 15.10.2025 made absolute until final disposal, maintaining status quo regarding transfer or creation of third-party rights in assets of Matrix, Tianish, NP, Swathi Gunupati Reddy, and Venkata Pranav Reddy Gunupati.
  • Direction issued on 12.02.2026 and 25.02.2026 for NP to furnish security of INR 600 crores.
  • Interim order modified on 16.03.2026 to allow respondents to operate assets in the normal course of business, provided immovable assets are not disposed of without leave of the Court.
  • Status quo extended to Moschip Technologies Ltd. on 11.05.2026, specifically regarding share swapping or transfer of shares.
  • Moschip Technologies Ltd. impleaded as a party.

Also in the document

  • The Court noted that NP has deposited Rs. 225 Crores in cash and title deeds for 37 acres of land (claimed value approx. Rs. 400 Crores) towards the security requirement.
  • The interim orders are currently absolute until the final disposal of the matters.
  • The Appellant disputes the value of the land deposited by NP.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments

Court order · 1 Sep 2026

Order 1 Sep 2026 · 0.5 MB Open the document On livelaw.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.