Courts Supreme Court
Delhi Court sentences Sukesh Chandrashekhar to 8 years for impersonating Supreme Court judge
This matter concerns the sentencing of Sukesh Chandrashekhar, who was previously convicted for impersonating a Supreme Court Judge to secure bail, threatening a public servant, and committing criminal intimidation.
The Court is determining the appropriate punishment based on the gravity of the offences and the offender's conduct.
Who it concerns: Petitioner/State: State (represented by Ld. APP Sh. Amit Yadav); Respondent/Convict: Sukesh Chandrashekhar (represented by Ld. Counsel Sh. Praveen Dabas); Bench: Not explicitly named in the provided text, but the order is issued by the Court in Cr. Case No. 5409/2018.
What the court decided
- The Court pronounces an order on sentence for the convict Sukesh Chandrashekhar.
- The Court considers the offences under Sections 170, 189, and 507 of the Indian Penal Code.
- The Court notes that the defense counsel requested immediate sentencing rather than utilizing the one-week time granted for arguments.
- The Court records that the defense counsel did not present mitigating circumstances but later sought concurrent sentences instead of consecutive ones.
- The Court considers the State's submission regarding 31 pending criminal cases against the convict across various states.
Also in the document
- The judgment of conviction was pronounced on 20.08.2026.
- The sentencing order is dated 29.08.2026.
- The State argued for a stringent approach and consecutive sentences, citing the convict's status as a 'seasoned conman' and pending cases in Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Delhi, Maharashtra, and Andhra Pradesh.
- The defense counsel argued that pending cases should not be considered as they are sub judice and the convict has not been convicted in them.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments
Court order · 31 Aug 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.