कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

Dowry Prohibition | Supreme Court Issues Directions For Strict Enforcement, Social Awareness…

This matter concerns the State of Uttar Pradesh and respondents in a criminal appeal regarding dowry-related offences, where the Court issued comprehensive directions for the strict enforcement of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, and speedy trials for cases under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC (Sections 80 and 85 BNS).

Petitioner: State of Uttar Pradesh; Respondents: Ajmal Beg and others; Bench: Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Augustine George Masih.

  • Directed States and Union Territories to ensure effective functioning of Dowry Prohibition Officers and strengthen support mechanisms like One Stop Centres and helplines.
  • Ordered educational curricula changes and awareness programs to address the social evil of dowry and promote gender equality.
  • Mandated that courts treat cases under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC as priority cases and identify those pending beyond three years for expeditious disposal.
  • Set directory benchmarks for trial progression, including framing charges within 60-90 days of the charge-sheet and continuous recording of evidence.
  • Required High Courts to integrate digital dashboards and automated alerts for monitoring case pendency.
  • Directed periodic training for judicial officers, police, and prosecutors on dowry-related offences.
  • Ordered High Courts and States to file compliance reports on January 15, May 15, and September 15.
  • Listed the matter for compliance-cum-periodic reports on October 15, 2026.

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

The original document

Order 2026-08-26
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official titleDowry Prohibition | Supreme Court Issues Directions For Strict Enforcement, Social Awareness & Speedy Trials
Source bodySupreme Court of India — orders & judgments
Reference number
Statusactive (order)
Year2026
Closing date2026-10-15
Documents1

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →