Saturday, 7 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Courts Supreme Court

Supreme Court rejects appeal listing until surrender exemption decided

The case concerns Tarunjit Tejpal's criminal appeal against the State of Goa, specifically addressing whether the appeal can be listed without the appellant surrendering, as required by Supreme Court rules.

Who it concerns: Petitioner: Tarunjit Tejpal; Respondent: The State of Goa; Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe (In Chamber).

What the court decided

  • The Court rejected the prayer to list the appeal without first considering the application for exemption from surrender.
  • The Court held that Order XX Rule 3 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 is mandatory, meaning the appeal cannot be listed until suitable orders are passed on the surrender exemption application.
  • The Court listed I.A. No. 254594 of 2026 (application seeking exemption from surrender) for consideration on 25.08.2026 to allow counsel to address the merits.

Also in the document

  • The Solicitor General opposed the exemption, citing the mandatory nature of the surrender rule, while acknowledging the Court has the power to waive it.
  • The Court noted that counsel for the petitioner had not yet addressed the merits of the exemption application.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments

Court order · Ref. TARUNJIT TEJPAL Vs THE STATE OF GOA|Diary No. 50909 / 2026Click Here To Read Order", · 24 Aug 2026

Order 24 Aug 2026 · 0.1 MB Open the document On livelaw.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.