कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

Supreme Court: Wife's earnings not reason to halve father's child maintenance

This case concerns a dispute over interim maintenance for two minor daughters, where the Supreme Court reviewed whether the High Court erred in reducing the father's liability solely because the mother is also earning an income.

Appellants: Sujata Kumari (wife) and two minor daughters; Respondents: Rahul Kumar (husband) and another; Bench: Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sanjeev Mehta.

  • Set aside the High Court order dated 9th February 2026.
  • Restore the Family Court order dated 21st October 2024 awarding Rs. 30,000 per month to each daughter.
  • Direct the respondent-husband to pay any arrears within three months.
  • Allow the appeal.
  • Dispose of pending applications.

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

The original document

Order 2026-08-21
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official titleWife Earning No Reason To Reduce Father's Liability To Maintain Children : Supreme Court
Source bodySupreme Court of India — orders & judgments
Reference number
Statusclosed (order)
Year2026
Closing date2026-08-20
Documents1

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →