Courts Supreme Court
Supreme Court orders CBI probe into custodial death, calls state cover-up sacrilegious
The case concerns the legal heirs of Shri Shravan Suryavanshi seeking a fair investigation into his custodial death and adequate compensation, challenging the High Court's decision which awarded only ₹1 lakh and did not direct a criminal…
₹25 LakhThe Court granted compensation of ₹25 Lakh to the petitioners.
The case concerns the legal heirs of Shri Shravan Suryavanshi seeking a fair investigation into his custodial death and adequate compensation, challenging the High Court's decision which awarded only ₹1 lakh and did not direct a criminal investigation.
Who it concerns: Petitioners: Lahra Bai Tamre & Ors. (wife and children of the deceased); Respondents: State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.; Bench: Justice Mehta.
What the court decided
- The Court ordered the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to conduct a probe into the custodial death.
- The Court granted compensation of ₹25 Lakh to the petitioners.
- The Court noted that the High Court had previously awarded ₹1 Lakh and failed to direct an FIR or investigation.
Also in the document
- The Court described the stance of the Director General of Police and other senior state officers as 'sacrilegious' and a 'cover-up story' for failing to act on the judicial inquiry report.
- The Court noted a discrepancy between the initial jail medical report (attributing death to alcoholic withdrawal) and the post-mortem report (attributing death to head injury).
- The matter was heard in the Extra Ordinary Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments
Court order · Ref. Diary No. 48963/2025 · 12 Aug 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.