कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

Supreme Court rules High Court overstepped in re-evaluating exam answer sheets

This case concerns an appeal by the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (UPPSC) against a High Court order that directed the re-evaluation of answer scripts for the 2016 Combined State/Upper Subordinate Services Examination. The core issue was whether the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by interfering with academic decisions regarding question papers and answer keys.

Appellants: U.P. Public Service Commission (through its Chairman) and another. Respondents: Sunil Kumar Singh and others. Bench: Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Sheel Nagu.

  • The Supreme Court set aside the impugned order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 9th December, 2016.
  • The Civil Appeal No. 4970 of 2017 is allowed.
  • Any pending interlocutory applications are disposed of.
  • The Court noted that the operation of the High Court's order had been stayed by the Supreme Court on 7th April, 2017, and thus the directions were not implemented.

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

The original document

Order 2026-08-11
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official titlePrinciples Of Judicial Review In Exam Evaluation Disputes : Supreme Court Explains
Source bodySupreme Court of India — orders & judgments
Reference number
Statusclosed (order)
Year2026
Closing date2026-08-05
Documents1

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →