कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

Supreme Court sets aside High Court's 2025 judgment, allows civil appeals

The case concerns a dispute over partition of property where the Appellant challenged the High Court's dismissal of their cross-objections, arguing that the High Court failed to decide a pending application for additional evidence under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC.

Appellant: Chowdappa; Respondents: Hanumantharayappa and others; Bench: Justice S.V.N. Bhatti and Justice N.V. Anjaria.

  • The Court set aside the High Court's judgment dated 16.12.2025.
  • The Court allowed the Civil Appeals.
  • The Court restored RFA No. 2076 of 2006 along with cross-objections.
  • The matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh disposal.
  • Pending applications, if any, were disposed of.

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

The original document

Order 2026-08-11
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official titleOrder 41 Rule 27 CPC | Supreme Court Explains Parameters To Decide Application For Additional Evidence
Source bodySupreme Court of India — orders & judgments
Reference number
Statusclosed (order)
Year2026
Closing date2026-08-06
Documents1

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →