Markets Securities & Exchange Board
SEBI finds promoter manipulated Timbor Home shares via off-market transfers
This order re-examines the case against Paresh Nathalal Chauhan regarding alleged market manipulation and offloading of shares in Timbor Home Limited, following a directive from the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) to ensure the noticee…
This order re-examines the case against Paresh Nathalal Chauhan regarding alleged market manipulation and offloading of shares in Timbor Home Limited, following a directive from the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) to ensure the noticee was properly served with the original Show Cause Notices and given a fair hearing.
Who it concerns: Paresh Nathalal Chauhan (Noticee); Timbor Home Limited (Company)
What SEBI found or ordered
- SAT remanded the case to SEBI because the original Show Cause Notices (SCNs) were not properly served to the Noticee, denying him the right to reply.
- SEBI granted multiple hearing opportunities and adjournments between August and December 2025 to comply with natural justice principles.
- The Noticee claimed his KYC documents were misused by his Chartered Accountant, Ankit Mehta, to open accounts without his consent.
- The Noticee argued he was a 'pass-through' conduit for shares and did not retain any economic benefit or derive gains from the transactions.
- The Noticee disputed the calculation of disgorgement amounts, stating SEBI treated gross sale value as ill-gotten gains without deducting costs.
- SEBI noted that in a separate appeal (No. 259/2022), the SAT had already upheld the factual findings regarding the scheme and modus operandi alleged in the SCN.
Also in the document
- The investigation period covers April 1, 2014, to May 30, 2015.
- SEBI found that promoter entities transferred shares off-market to connected entities, which then circulated bulk SMS to recommend buying the shares and manipulated prices before selling.
- The Noticee's defense relies on the claim that his accounts were used by a third party (Ankit Mehta) for fraudulent purposes, a claim SEBI is currently evaluating against the established facts of the scheme.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) — enforcement orders
Regulatory order · Ref. WTM/AB/EFD- · 31 Dec 2025
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.