Saturday, 7 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Markets Securities & Exchange Board

2,91,744 BSE stock option trades found non-genuine, SEBI orders adjudication

This order addresses SEBI's investigation into Prachi Tradevine Pvt Ltd for allegedly executing non-genuine reversal trades in illiquid stock options on the BSE, which created artificial trading volume.

SEBI examined whether these actions violated regulations prohibiting fraudulent and unfair trade practices.

Who it concerns: Prachi Tradevine Pvt Ltd (PAN: AAFCP7889L)

What SEBI found or ordered

  • SEBI observed that Prachi Tradevine Pvt Ltd executed 8 non-genuine trades in 4 stock option contracts, resulting in an artificial volume of 1,67,000 units.
  • SEBI alleged violations of Regulations 3(a), (b), (c), (d), 4(1), and 4(2)(a) of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003.
  • The company was offered two settlement schemes (SEBI Settlement Scheme 2022 and ISO Settlement Scheme 2024) but did not avail either.
  • The company failed to respond to the Show Cause Notice or attend the hearing, leading SEBI to proceed ex-parte and presume the allegations were admitted.
  • The order is an adjudication proceeding under Section 15-I of the SEBI Act, 1992, with potential penalties under Section 15HA.

Also in the document

  • The specific trades by this entity were part of a larger pattern where 2,91,744 trades (81.40% of all BSE stock option trades during the period) were found to be non-genuine.
  • The period of investigation covered April 01, 2014, to September 30, 2015.
  • The company was served via public notice in three newspapers (The Statesman, Sanmarg, Duranta Barta) because direct service at its address failed.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) — enforcement orders

Regulatory order · Ref. Order/AK/RK/2025-26/32334 · 8 Apr 2026

Order 8 Apr 2026 · 0.6 MB Open the document On sebi.gov.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.