Markets Securities & Exchange Board
SEBI finds Rose Securities executed 12 non-genuine trades in 3 stock options
This order addresses SEBI's findings that Rose Securities Limited executed non-genuine reversal trades in illiquid stock options on the BSE, creating artificial trading volume.
It details the adjudication process and the presumption of liability due to the company's failure to respond to the show cause notice.
Who it concerns: Rose Securities Limited (PAN: AADCR1312E)
What SEBI found or ordered
- SEBI found that Rose Securities Limited executed 12 non-genuine trades in 3 stock option contracts between April 1, 2014, and September 30, 2015.
- These trades resulted in the creation of artificial volume totaling 16,64,000 units.
- The trades were deemed manipulative and deceptive under Regulations 3(a), (b), (c), (d), 4(1), and 4(2)(a) of the PFUTP Regulations, 2003.
- The Show Cause Notice was served via public notice on March 20, 2026, after multiple failed delivery attempts.
- No response was received from the Noticee, leading the Adjudicating Officer to proceed ex-parte and presume the allegations were admitted.
- The order notes that the Noticee's artificial volume contributed 24.25% to 31.38% of the total market volume in the specific contracts involved.
Also in the document
- The investigation period (2014-2015) concluded long before the public notice was issued in 2026, citing the absence of prescribed timelines for identifying non-genuine trades.
- The specific trade example cited involved a buy and sell with the same counterparty (Hotel Polo Towers Private Limited) within seconds, with a significant price difference (Rs 0.1 vs Rs 6 per unit).
- The order references a broader investigation where 14,720 entities were found to be involved in similar non-genuine trades on BSE.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) — enforcement orders
Regulatory order · Ref. Order/AK/GN/2026-27/32362 · 20 Apr 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.