Tender Document & Advertisement
Plain-language summary (AI-generated) — a quick read so you don't have to open the full PDF. May contain errors; the original document below is authoritative.
What is this tender for?
The National Testing Agency (NTA) is contracting for the use of software or algorithms to conduct Computer-Based Tests (CBT) for professional entrance and eligibility examinations, based on the number of candidates.
Who can bid / win?
Not stated in the document.
Key terms
- Estimated/Contract Value: Not stated
- EMD/Security Amount: Rs 100,00,000 (One Crore)
- Tender Type: Online Bids through e-procurement CPPP site
- Bid Submission Deadline: 14th September 2018
- Bid Validity: Not stated
- Contract Duration: Not stated
| Source body | National Testing Agency (NTA) |
| Reference number | NTA/2018-19/002 |
| Status | closed (section: archive) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Closing date | 2018-09-14 |
| Documents | 1 |
Highlights & Points worth asking
Auto-generated, neutral observations. Auto-generated from public documents. May contain errors. Not legal or financial advice. Always verify against the linked original document. KaunZimmedar is a platform, not an authority.
These are factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents below — not findings, opinions, or allegations of wrongdoing. Verify each against the linked original.
What we observed
- It is among the most-amended tenders for this body in our archive (3 corrigenda recorded).
Points a citizen might reasonably ask
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?
Documents
The original government PDF is the authoritative source — shown below, or open it full-screen in a new tab.
Notice
7434e2d6_TENDER_NOTICE_ADVT_FINAL.pdf
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Discussion (0)
Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.
Open discussion (0) →