Sunday, 8 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Markets Securities & Exchange Board

SEBI finds prima facie evidence of fund diversion in Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar case

This order addresses SEBI's investigation into Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Limited (BHSL) and two individuals regarding alleged diversion of funds and non-disclosure of related party transactions between FY 2010-11 and FY 2021-22.

It details the procedural history, including the issuance of a Show Cause Notice, the filing of settlement applications, and the subsequent withdrawal of those applications following a Bombay High Court directive.

Who it concerns: Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Limited, Shishir Bajaj, Kushagra Bajaj

What SEBI found or ordered

  • SEBI found prima facie evidence of diversion of ₹318.50 crore to entities under the control of Shishir Bajaj and Kushagra Bajaj via Ojas Industries Private Limited (OIPL) between Dec 2013 and Aug 2014.
  • SEBI found prima facie evidence of diversion of ₹870.60 crore via Bajaj Power Generation Private Limited (BPGPL) for infrastructure projects between Nov 2011 and Oct 2014.
  • SEBI alleged misleading information regarding related party transactions in annual reports since March 2014.
  • A Show Cause Notice was issued on October 16, 2023, alleging violations of the SEBI Act, SCRA, PFUTP Regulations, and LODR Regulations.
  • The Noticees filed settlement applications in December 2023 but withdrew them on February 25, 2026.
  • The Bombay High Court (W.P. No. 3409 of 2024) directed SEBI to pass a reasoned order on the issue of jurisdiction before disposing of the matter on merits.
  • Hearings were conducted on multiple dates, including February 26, 2026, March 20, 2026, April 22, 2026, and May 06, 2026.

Also in the document

  • The total amount of alleged fund diversion identified by SEBI is approximately ₹1,189.10 crore (₹318.50 crore + ₹870.60 crore).
  • The investigation period spans over a decade (FY 2010-11 to FY 2021-22).
  • The Noticees cited forensic audits by Deloitte and Mazars that concluded no diversion or misappropriation occurred, arguing these reports were not considered by SEBI's approving authority.
  • The Noticees raised objections regarding a 9-year delay in issuing the Show Cause Notice after the alleged transactions.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

⚠ Figures not confirmed. Our automated check could not find every number in this summary in the document. Treat the figures with care and check the original.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

This document is in our archive but is not shown on our front pages: a number in the summary could not be found in the document.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) — enforcement orders

Regulatory order · 13 May 2026

Order 13 May 2026 · 0.8 MB Open the document On sebi.gov.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.